Talk:Woodford Reserve

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Work permit in topic Neutrality

Merge Labrot & Graham

edit

I propose this for various reasons:

  • Neither article is particularly long
  • Labrot & Graham (LG) article is currently about the distillery, which has been called various names, and now is officially renamed Woodford Reserve Distillery.
  • LG, if only about the distillery, should otherwise be renamed to include "Distillery" in the article title, unless the scope is expanded.

Eoghanacht talk 19:17, 4 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

How is the landmark distillery building being used?

edit

When visiting Maker's Mark it was noted that it is the only National Historic Landmark distillery where historic buildings are actually being used for distilling. Is this still the case at Woodford Reserve? Are historic buildings only for show, or have they started putting them to work? I know that the other, Bomberger's Distillery, has been closed for many years. (Jack Daniel's is not an NHL, although it is on the Nat'l Register). — Eoghanacht talk 19:17, 4 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Woodford Reserve clearly uses Landmark buildings in the distilling process. The Maker's Mark article has been edited to state, "It was the first distillery in America to be so recognized where landmark buildings were actively used for distilling." ArrJay (talk) 16:55, 7 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

I second the merger.

edit

I think the casual wiki user looking for information about Woodford Reserve isn't going to look for the LG page. They are both rather short on there own.

Thirded. --ERNesbitt 16:39, 14 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Food and drink Tagging

edit

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and careful attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 03:32, 4 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Neutrality

edit

There is no discussion about the neutrality of this article. Since it is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given, I am removing the tag.---- Work permit (talk) 01:10, 1 September 2019 (UTC)Reply