Talk:Woodcreeper

Birds Mid‑importance

Woodcreeper is part of WikiProject Birds, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative and easy-to-use ornithological resource. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Please do not substitute this template.BirdsWikipedia:WikiProject BirdsTemplate:WikiProject Birdsbird articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Birds To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Endemic birds of Papua New Guinea (more)
Cleanup : Bullfinch • Vesper sparrow • Bird flight • Bird bath (more)
Copyedit : Plushcap • Magpie duck • Saker falcon (more)
Expand : Phalarope • Nidicolous • Gouldian finch • Cathartes • Cnemophilidae • Avian malaria (more)
NPOV : Debeaking • Driven grouse shooting • Abu Dhabi Falcon Hospital (more)
Stubs : Cathartiformes • Semiplumbeous hawk • Rainbow-bearded Thornbill • Sunda scops owl (more)
Update : Coal tit • Scottish crossbill • New Caledonian lorikeet • Operation Migration (more)
Verify : Argus (bird) • Blyth's frogmouth • Nik Borrow • Pytilia • Fregata • Chestnut-headed tesia • Darter • Pallid scops owl • Starling (more)
Wikify : Ninox boobook ocellata • The Institute for Bird Populations (more)
Other : Add photos to bird articles needing photos (search Flickr for free images). Add taxonomic authorities to genus articles.

More outstanding tasks at the project's cleanup listing, Category:Birds articles needing attention, and Wikipedia:WikiProject Birds/Todo.

Merging edit

Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

See argument at Talk:Xenops. Either Xenops should go into Woodcreeper, or both should be merged on Dendrocolaptinae, which as of now redirects to Woodcreeper. Dysmorodrepanis 10:31, 5 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

The articles are currently inconsistent and I'm not adequately informed to sort this out. The Ovenbird article refers to this article as covering the subfamily, but the article actually only covers the true woodcreepers, bypassing the Xenops which the family article claims is part of the sub-family.

Something needs to be done, at the very least there needs to be consistency between articles in the family. JohnCastle 20:45, 29 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Add topic