 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
Would you delete the article English language because the articles American English and British English already exist? --Vuo 19:32, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
- Huh? --Dante Alighieri | Talk 21:05, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
- You're about to delete a stub article about a field of engineering, since there are articles about its subfields. --Vuo 00:07, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
- Sending to Wiktionary for the time being. I'm sure this is an expandable stub. theProject 21:14, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
- Hello?? Can't you get at least some editor who knows something about engineering? Maybe it's a stub now. --Vuo 00:05, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
- This has nothing to do with knowledge of engineering, this has to do with the fact that the "article" is currently no more than a definition. Definitions belong at Wiktionary, not here. --Dante Alighieri | Talk 16:07, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
- A stub encyclopaedia article and a dictionary article are two quite different things. Don't conflate them. "Wood processing" is not an idiom. Uncle G 22:56, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
- This has nothing to do with knowledge of engineering, this has to do with the fact that the "article" is currently no more than a definition. Definitions belong at Wiktionary, not here. --Dante Alighieri | Talk 16:07, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
- Hello?? Can't you get at least some editor who knows something about engineering? Maybe it's a stub now. --Vuo 00:05, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
- Sending to Wiktionary for the time being. I'm sure this is an expandable stub. theProject 21:14, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
- You're about to delete a stub article about a field of engineering, since there are articles about its subfields. --Vuo 00:07, 12 August 2006 (UTC)