Talk:Women in the military in Europe

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 13 May 2019 and 1 July 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Illegalillegirl. Peer reviewers: Hamway98.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 13:08, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned references in Women in the military in Europe

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Women in the military in Europe's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "ReferenceA":

• From Red Army: See Г. Ф. Кривошеев, Россия и СССР в войнах XX века: потери вооруженных сил. Статистическое исследование (G. F. Krivosheev, Russia and the USSR in the wars of the 20th century: losses of the Armed Forces. A Statistical Study, in Russian)
• From Women in the military by country: http://www.nato.int/ims/2005/win/national_reports/turkey.pdf

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 15:41, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Critique of Women in the military in Europe

The first point I noticed about this article, was that it is researched incredibly well. With only one exception, each country outlined in the article has a wealth of solid information.

At the beginning of the article, Wikipedia has pointed out that it has not been summarized properly. One way to fix this would be to add a brief timeline to outline the history of European woman in the military. It could read like this: ‘European countries have had varying policies regarding women and military service. While some of the countries have always allowed women to participate in military activities, most began seeing the value of servicewomen during the First World War when they began losing unprecedented number servicemen. Most countries began allowing women to do clerical jobs, then drivers, and even large artillery operators in later years. In present time many of the European countries allow women to participate in full active duty, with few or no restrictions at all. ‘

The country headings of the article are very useful, but could be helped out with sub-headings. Each country has far too much pertinent information for just the single heading. This would create a greater ease-of-access for anyone looking for a quick fact, or a starting point for further research. As an example, in the Denmark portion a sub-heading could be, ‘Ground Observers Troop (Circa 1934).’ This would then be followed by any information pertaining to that in the article.

Another way to organize would be by decade within the country. This leads me to my next point; the Finland portion seems to jump around chronologically makes the article hard to follow. While the information is very informative, it is a bit hard to piece together. This could be avoided with decade sub-headings.

My last point is about the portion on Sweden. How long has Sweden allowed women in the military? Have they had any struggles within the military? There is not enough information in comparison to the other countries outlined. One point I found about their current struggles are the difficulties with army issue undergarments. I found several newspaper articles about this, including what the Swedish Military has done in the past and what they will do in the future to prevent undergarment malfunction. Nanner888 (talk) 20:52, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Cantiniere1800s.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Cantiniere1800s.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Media without a source as of 19 August 2011 What should I do? Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 17:42, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Women in the military in Europe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Replaced archive link http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:TISDmDOMxlIJ:www.nato.int/ims/2006/win/pdf/norway_report.pdf+women+in+the+norwegian+armed+forces&hl=en&gl=uk&ct=clnk&cd=3 with https://web.archive.org/web/20090511161602/http://www.nato.int/ims/2006/win/pdf/norway_report.pdf on http://www.nato.int/ims/2006/win/pdf/norway_report.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927045646/http://www.rekryc.mil.se/article.php?id=11756 to http://www.rekryc.mil.se/article.php?id=11756
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120929073139/http://www.mod.uk/DefenceInternet/FactSheets/WomenInTheArmedForces.htm to http://www.mod.uk/DefenceInternet/FactSheets/WomenInTheArmedForces.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:39, 23 May 2017 (UTC)