Talk:Women's rights in 2014
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 17 June 2015. The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 20 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Campus Rape a bit narrow and anecdotal edit
I think the section jumps into some details, rather than providing some of the more important changes including continued developments in making it easier for women to report and get heard, significant increases in Clery Act investigations, improvements in support for women etc. The Emma Sulcowitz case is probably too detailed and singular an example for such a high level article. Also, for an article that's supposedly global in scope, this is a very US-centric section. Accordingly, it seems overweight as written. Mattnad (talk) 15:40, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
Radical Islam, disciplinary panels edit
@Chess: I recognize that your edits are made in good faith, but the content you recently added was WP:UNDUE and lacks a neutral point of view. The overabundance of Washington Examiner sources aren't really a plus either. Let's stick to topics that are directly related to women's rights. Please observe WP:BRD and gain consensus for changes you want to make here. gobonobo + c 03:28, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Women's History § Women's rights by year article(s). {{u|Sdkb}} talk 21:59, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:08, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
