Talk:Women's Protection Bill

Latest comment: 8 years ago by AnomieBOT in topic Orphaned references in Women's Protection Bill


Sex with prepubescent girls edit

I removed a sentence from the article because it has no basis in Islam, but rather sounds like it has been placed in order to misguide people.

Orphaned references in Women's Protection Bill edit

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Women's Protection Bill's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "ML252007: 1296":

  • From Muhammad Zia-ul-Haq's Islamization: Lau, Martin (1 September 2007). "Twenty-Five Years of Hudood Ordinances- A Review". Washington and Lee Law Review. 64 (4): 1292. Retrieved 18 November 2014.
  • From Hudood Ordinances: Lau, "Twenty-Five Years of Hudood Ordinances", 2007: p.1296

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 23:32, 17 November 2015 (UTC)Reply