This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
the edits by 81.179.69.218 needs to be checked for NPOV --Melaen 16:41, 18 December 2005 (UTC)Reply
The "controversies" section is almost laughably biased against the group. I'm changing it.
No it isn't - everything is factual and fully backed up with very reputable sources. I'd say the rest of the article is laughably biased towards the group. I'm changing it.
There is no other references in the article at all. If you wipe that section off then the entire article needs to be wiped off. It is ridiculous demanding one section to be vigorously referenced when the whole article doesn't. It is hard to google their YouTube page and see the videos for themselves. -- Writer —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.173.108.154 (talk • contribs)
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Just to avoid any further deleting of the help for men section here is the screen shot of the site as of 6th March 2008 proving that section of the article to be 100% accurate: -- [deleted image removed] Shakehandsman (talk) 00:41, 15 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
