Talk:Wolfiporia extensa

Latest comment: 16 days ago by Lanya in topic Update to binomial

Comment

edit

I do not understand the revisions to this article by Deli nk. He/she removed a great deal of factual information as well as an image of Tuckahoe. I undid their revisions because they greatly decreased the information on the page. They did add a taxonomic history which I retained. I would appreciate if they choose to delete the contents of this page that they provide a reason for doing so.

trappem

(Boldly moved this comment by User:Trappem to this page from a subpage created in error.)--Fabrictramp | talk to me 16:43, 11 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Uses

edit

Besides the part about traditional Chinese medicine, do any of the uses of the this fungus come from standard medicine? Is there a citation? Any normal medical literature? Umma Kynes 20:34, 6 April 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ummakynes (talkcontribs)

Article title

edit

...should be changed to Wolfiporia extensa or Poria cocos.`Jatlas (talk) 17:29, 17 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Update to binomial

edit

There are multiple references to P. cocos in this entry. I had to scroll up to figure out that it was a synonym. I aim to update the entry and replace all the P. cocos with W. extensa, though I might get interrupted and not remember to come back and finish. (Such is my life these days.) Lanya (talk) 22:11, 30 August 2024 (UTC)Reply