Talk:Woese's dogma
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
editThis article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Zsurani3.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 04:55, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
editThis article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Scpavuluri. Peer reviewers: Aghelms, Jswashington2.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 04:55, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Addition & Suggestions
editI have added the sentence This led to the advancement of the phylogentic tree of life consisting of three domains rather than the previously accepted two. My suggestions are listed below:
- This article does not explain the controversy that was very prevalent in Woese’s findings which led to a delayed acceptance of his theory on the three domains of life
- The article does not have a link to Archaebacteria, which is the fundamental discovery that is central to his research
- The article title should be changed to The Woeseian Revolution to more explicitly indicate how the findings revolutionized the prior established dogma of a prokaryotic/eukaryotic dichotomy — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mejia.25.osu (talk • contribs) 12:22, 1 October 2014 (UTC)