Talk:Winzapper

It seems noteworthy to me. The sources are maybe not stellar--but adaquate —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.72.86.223 (talk) 05:22, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

Objections to "spam" designation"

1. It is a freeware product, which makes the motivation for spam questionable;
2. It has been the subject of numerous articles in IT publications;
3. It is the only software out there to my knowledge which performs the function of selective security log event deletion, which is an important consideration in IT security.

Stayman Apple 00:45, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

The burden of proof is on the author to provide reliable sources to prove that the subject of the article is notable enough by Wikipedia standards for inclusion. Also, please do not remove WP:SPEEDY templates on articles that you yourself have created. shoy 00:50, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

I request that it go through the full AfD process. Stayman Apple 01:15, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Other sources

• http://www.techsupportalert.com/issues/issue36.htm

File:Winzapperinaction.png Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Winzapperinaction.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 19 May 2012 What should I do? Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Winzapperinaction.png) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 10:08, 23 May 2012 (UTC)