Talk:Winifred Hoernlé/GA1
GA Review edit
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Sainsf (talk · contribs) 08:09, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi, I will take this :) Posting my comments soon. Sainsf (talk · contribs) 08:09, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
Beautifully well-written and comprehensive. A most pleasant read :) Here are my comments:
- No dablinks, broken external links or copyvio concerns.
- Duplinks - only one, University of Cape Town (University faculty (1923–1937))
- Citations formatted really well, including Selected works, though the author name formats, case used in titles and dates should be made more consistent. But an excellent job overall.
- Comments on prose
Prose is engaging and definitely meets GA standards. A few queries and suggestions:
- Lead does a great job at summarizing the whole article. But I found the reason behind her death missing in the article and especially the lead, is no information available on this?
- 'A' for anthropologist in infobox
Hoernlé joined twenty-one other white liberals
This should ideally be '21' per the MOS (There might be other cases)
- In Selected Works why is there a 'Mrs.' in places?
- I am curious why "!Nau" is in italics
Hoernlé, Mrs. R.F.A.
Whose initials are those?
academics and social welfare.[Notes 1]
Should be 'Note'
Sainsf Thank you very much for the review. I truly appreciate it. I am not sure what to do about her name in the works section, so if you want me to do something, let me know. I tend to follow the sources, as that seems the most logical thing to do with women's name changes. But, obviously, other people find the inconsistency of names to be distracting. SusunW (talk) 18:23, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for the clarification, SusunW. I had never come across this issue. I would prefer her correct initials, thought her name was the same throughout and you were missing initials at places. I am not too much into consistency when it comes to citations unless we are preparing for an FAC, so the article as it stands now is perfect for GA promotion. Thank you for your work on this wonderful article, keep it up! Sainsf (talk · contribs) 18:40, 23 April 2020 (UTC)