Talk:Windradyne

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Michael Bednarek in topic Tendentious edit

Orphaned tag edit

I do not believe the tag is appropriate - two articles link to this one - check "What links here". There are many other wikipedia articles that have similar quantities of links. The tag is not useful as it is unlikely to produce more links. It should be reserved when no links are used or when more links could be used. --Golden Wattle talk 00:56, 18 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Windradyne. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:15, 17 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Tendentious edit edit

I believe this edit on 30 September 2019 by 101.165.49.147, their only ever edit, is mostly tendentious. That language is not supported by the sources and it ought to be reverted. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 12:05, 13 August 2022 (UTC)Reply