Talk:Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker

Learn more about this page

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

New York City

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

64.125.236.10 (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article.

History edit

Latest comment: 8 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

That introductory paragraph could use some help, especially the second sentence. Stacyrp (talk) 00:34, 7 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

American Airline controversy edit

Latest comment: 6 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The American Airline controversy is listed under the section titled "Recognition."

I think it would be better to add a section called "Controversies," and add the paragraph under the new section. Recognition kind of implies something benign or good, and that's not the case for what happened with the court case. Additionally, I think a "Controversies" section is pretty standard for wikipedia articles that point out bad things.

(Eventually, that paragraph should include the firm was fired by American Airlines. And the firm's responce (firing the attorney?) should be included in the response).

96.244.11.84 (talk) 19:50, 29 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic