Talk:William Post (lottery winner)

Latest comment: 3 months ago by Robertsky in topic Requested move 19 February 2024


Requested move 19 February 2024 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. – robertsky (talk) 03:52, 27 February 2024 (UTC)Reply


– No primary topic for this name. Natg 19 (talk) 20:55, 19 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

  • Support per nomination. There are three men named "William Post" listed upon the William Post (disambiguation) page, with no indication that one of them was renowned to such a degree as to exceed the combined notability of the remaining two men. —Roman Spinner (talkcontribs) 21:52, 19 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
  • Support per nom and Roman Spinner. Skynxnex (talk) 21:59, 19 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
  • Support per nominator. No clear primary topic for this name, so the safest bet is to have the disambiguation page at the basename. Paintspot Infez (talk) 23:13, 19 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
  • https://wikinav.toolforge.org/?language=en&title=William_Post indicates 674 incoming views, and only 12 identified outgoing clickstreams to another topic, so the hatnote clicks were under the anonymization threshold at best. All-time monthly page views for these topics doesn't clearly indicate much, either. A couple of the spikes in traffic correlated with traffic to Bill Post, a couple didn't. As the long-term significance of a lottery winner is not particularly clear, disambiguation seems like a safe choice here. --Joy (talk) 15:36, 20 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
  • Support as per nom. 162 etc. (talk) 17:33, 20 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
  • Comment This article is essentially orphaned, and may be a candidate for WP:AFD, per WP:NOTNEWS. 162 etc. (talk) 17:33, 20 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
  • Support per nom. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:23, 22 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
  • Support I thought I already added my opinion, but this William Post is no more important than the William Post who helped invent Pop-Tarts. I might be a bit biased as I helped write the Pop-Tarts William Post, but this guy's not the main William Post. ❤HistoryTheorist❤ 04:20, 26 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.