A fact from William Hopkinson Cox appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 20 June 2011 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
A local history book from the 1800s is not a reliable source for an 800 year genealogical descent. Further, the cited source is imprecise. "...tracing back their relationship to William the Conqueror" is meaningless, grammatically. It could imply that they trace a descent from William the Conqueror, it could be referring to 'back to the time of William the Conqueror'. This source [1] says of the Cox family "came over with William the Conqueror", which is more akin to the second than to the first. Such a descent, even were it true, was part and parcel of 19th century historiography of which the source is an example, but is not what modern historians consider noteworthy, DYK notwithstanding. Agricolae (talk) 01:33, 29 May 2017 (UTC)Reply