Confusion with William Darwin Fox edit

I'm still not 100% sure that we are dealing with two people here and not one. I have created this article as it seems probable that there were two synonymic contemporaries, but if anyone can shed some light one way or the other I'd be relieved. I suggest for simplicity that any discussion takes place on the William Darwin Fox talk page where there is already some material. Naturenet | Talk 14:18, 8 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

This site seems to contradict the notion that there were two separate W.D. Foxes: http://www.experiencefestival.com/a/William_Darwin_Fox_-_Biography/id/5588075 The definite answer might be given by Larkum's A Natural Calling.

Eucamerotus foxi edit

Eucamerotus only received its specific name in 1995, when William Blows named Eucamerotus foxi. Thus there was never a phase with a Latinised "Eucamerotus foxii".--MWAK (talk) 04:53, 20 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:22, 15 January 2022 (UTC)Reply