Talk:Wild horse (disambiguation)

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles

June 2006 edit

Latest comment: 17 years ago4 comments1 person in discussion

Removed copyrighted information from ~~http://www.wildhorsepreservation.com/resources/native.html~~ and related pages -- Kim van der Linde ^{at venus} 17:28, 17 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Should be http://www.wildhorsepreservation.com/resources/wild.html -- Kim van der Linde ^{at venus} 18:19, 17 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

The document you reference has this note at the end: Please note: This document is the intellectual property of Drs. Jay F. Kirkpatrick and Patricia M. Fazio. As such, altering of content in any manner is strictly prohibited. However, this statement may be copied and distributed freely in hardcopy, electronic, or Website form. Please include footnotes (February 26, 2005).

Thank you for reading carefully before deleting other people's posts. This took a lot of my time.— Preceding unsigned comment added by VirginieLP (talk • contribs) 17:44, 17 June 2006

Sorry, the page states: Copyright © 2004-2005 AWHPC. All rights reserved. furthermore, it states: As such, altering of content in any manner is strictly prohibited. This is inndirect conflict with the GNU Free Documentation License, and see the copyright notice of wikip[edia that states: That is to say, Wikipedia content can be copied, modified, and redistributed so long as the new version grants the same freedoms to others and acknowledges the authors of the Wikipedia article used (a direct link back to the article satisfies our author credit requirement).. As such, the licence of the originating site conflicts with wikipedias copyright, and therefore it is not allowed to be copied. -- Kim van der Linde ^{at venus} 17:51, 17 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

You are confusing two documents: the article I contributed (and you deleted) is my original work (I run AWHPC) and can be edited at will. The Kirkpatrick/Fazio article is just a link, so the GNU license is not an issue. I am a copyright lawyer, so I am kind of familiar with the points you bring up. Frankly, it looks to me like this is a convenient way to suppress speech that you disagree with.— Preceding unsigned comment added by VirginieLP (talk • contribs) 18:12, 17 June 2006

So, you say that I can copy the information, modify it as I like and use it as I like? -- Kim van der Linde ^{at venus} 18:18, 17 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Add topic