Talk:Wil Francis

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Goroth in topic Update

Fair use rationale for Image:A wiL.jpg

edit
 

Image:A wiL.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talkcontribsBot) 04:58, 25 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Update

edit

There needs to be a unbiased section added based around the allegations and controversies. There is also no mention anywhere of his ex wife, Lindsay Francis, that needs to be fixed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.45.34.86 (talk) 20:17, 11 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

It was in there. I added it myself. Someone went back and not only deleted it, but deleted all of the citations. He's had some weird fans trying to cover it up on Wikipedia. Chitoryu12 (talk) 13:43, 2 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

I'm not a great writer but it seems like the allegations in this Daily Beast article should be included: https://www.thedailybeast.com/inside-an-alleged-abusive-emo-sex-cult-none-of-these-poor-girls-could-say-no?ref=scroll — Preceding unsigned comment added by 45.49.167.212 (talk) 05:34, 26 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

This may be a better source. --Goroth (talk) 15:10, 12 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

cleanup

edit

This article reads like it was written by a 13 year old. Can we clean this up and try organizing it better? Steve Richter 23:40, 10 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

No kidding, the trivia section is ridiculous ("He has majorly small feet, like, size 3 or 4") 207.179.148.170 15:59, 25 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

HE IS HOMOSEXUAL! - wtf? Who wrote this? MAJOR clean up needed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.141.38.199 (talk) 07:47, 21 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

What sort of stupid way is that to spell a name? "wiL"? What the fuck? --79.65.26.141 (talk) 20:51, 5 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Does anyone else think this article sounds like a grade school essay? Wil has also shown his reliance on friendship [factoid], etc? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.11.252.253 (talk) 10:26, 10 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Yeah this article is terrible, it should either be cleaned up or deleted Fluorescent-pig (talk) 18:19, 10 August 2008 (UTC)Reply