Talk:Wikimedia Foundation v. WordLogic Corporation et al
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Gråbergs Gråa Sång in topic Hmm
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 9 April 2020. The result of the discussion was merge. |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Hmm edit
Per references, this doesn't seem to be in WP:GNG territory. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 10:52, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
- It is now that I added the Techdirt article. Nemo 13:09, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
- Yeah, that's a blog, not that great. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 15:13, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
- Uh? It's a prominent publication in the field. Nemo 18:12, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
- Still a blog. (I'm not saying it's not a great blog, it may be). And, if considered to "count" towards WP:GNG, not enough in itself. The other ref is not "coverage". Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 04:07, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
- "Being a blog" is not in itself a qualification, either positive or negative, for sources, just like it's irrelevant whether a news sites runs on Wordpress or Joomla. I suggest that you read Wikipedia:Reliable sources more closely. Nemo 06:33, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
- I'll trade you WP:BLOGS, part of a policy. But as I said, with or without Techdirt, the article currently fails WP:GNG. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 09:43, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
- "Being a blog" is not in itself a qualification, either positive or negative, for sources, just like it's irrelevant whether a news sites runs on Wordpress or Joomla. I suggest that you read Wikipedia:Reliable sources more closely. Nemo 06:33, 8 April 2020 (UTC)