Talk:Widlar current source

Electronics Low‑importance

	Electronics portal This article is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the project talk pageElectronicsWikipedia:WikiProject ElectronicsTemplate:WikiProject Electronicselectronic articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

DC current mirror edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Reference has been moved so link is no longer valid. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.82.213.125 (talk) 20:49, 11 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Source versus mirror edit

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

After some careful analysis of the Widlar current source, I came to the conclusion that the this circuit is called source rather than mirror because the two currents on each branch of the circuit do not match. If I try to match the currents in both branches, I obtain an emitter resistance of 0Ω which is reducing the circuit to the simple current mirror. Does all this make sense or am I saying something stupid?

ICE77 (talk) 19:43, 24 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

I get the same, even negative resistances for some configs.

Hansschulze (talk) 00:59, 6 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Design procedure with specified currents edit

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I tried to get IO=5uA, IR1=10uA (best error%) in LTSpice and IR2=4.997uA while IO=4.869uA. Looks to me like 129nA of base current isn't accounted for in the right place. I would prefer that IO gets 4.997uA and IR2 = IO + IQ2B. But I ain't smart enough to fix the formula.

Hansschulze (talk) 01:57, 6 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Add topic