Talk:Widerøe
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
Assessment comment
editThe comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Widerøe/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
Needs more citations.Gittinsj 01:46, 19 March 2007 (UTC)gittinsj |
Last edited at 01:46, 19 March 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 10:33, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Widerøe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://archive.is/20071211112855/http://www.wideroe.no/modules/module_123/proxy.asp?D=2&C=479&I=3286 to http://www.wideroe.no/modules/module_123/proxy.asp?D=2&C=479&I=3286
- Added archive https://archive.is/20081223134142/http://www.wideroe.no/modules/module_123/proxy.asp?D=2&C=658&I=4523&U=Y&language=EN to http://www.wideroe.no/modules/module_123/proxy.asp?D=2&C=658&I=4523&U=Y&language=EN
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:44, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
dash-8-100 replacment is obvious
edithello friends, the 100 series (and why not 200) will be replaced within 10 years perhaps (since they just painted some aircraft) by these electric commuter things. they will do higher frequency shorter distance with fewer passenger and quality of service will increase because of denser schedules. read it here first folks! https://www.ainonline.com/aviation-news/air-transport/2021-03-11/wideroe-goes-electric-tecnams-p-volt
enjoy! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.255.12.48 (talk) 15:34, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- Hello, the solution really wasn't that clear until recently. The problem with these electric commuter aircraft is they are way smaller than the DHC-8-100/200 - they seat only 9 passengers instead of 37-44 like the DHCs - and Widerøe needs a plane of comparable size to replace them. I've actually heard that ATR has been at it with the 48-seat 42 series modifying it to be STOL-capable like the DHCs - perhaps these are viable replacements instead? - PRL Nerd (talk) 21:38, 24 October 2021 (UTC)