Talk:Wica
Latest comment: 17 years ago by Jkelly in topic Witchcraft Information Centre and Archive
 | Disambiguation | |||
| ||||
Redirect to Wicca
editNot helpful to just redirect, since Wica and WICA have been used as terms in their own right.
- Probably should be merged and redirected to Wicca (disambiguation) now, though. Jkelly 19:07, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
- Why? You haven't given any reasons.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.204.85.97 (talk • contribs)
- Because it is a likely misspelling for a much more likely search inquiry. Wicca (disambiguation) could easily list the few items here. Jkelly 16:42, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
Witchcraft Information Centre and Archive
editThe point of wikipedia is to be an encyclopedia. That means it should include information on all subjects. WICA is also an acronym used by the Witchcraft Information Centre and Archive. That is useful information for users of wikipedia. It is not clear why JKelly keeps deleting this entry.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.204.85.97 (talk • contribs)
- Wikipedia:Disambiguation pages are an internal mechanism to help readers find the article that they are looking for. They aren't intended as a list of all existing things that might be named the same thing as the page. Entries that do not correspond to articles don't belong here. Jkelly 19:07, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
- Perhaps this should not be a disambiguation page then, but a full article.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.204.85.97 (talk • contribs)
- Please sign your Talk page comments using ~~~~. It's not clear to me what this would be an article on. "List of things that use WICA as an acronym" would certainly be deleted. Jkelly 16:45, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
- Wikipedia can be edited anonymously, therefore, there is no obligation upon anyone to sign their comments ever. It is not correct for you or anyone else to add such signatures.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.204.85.97 (talk • contribs)
- Every edit to Wikipedia, including to Talk pages, is licensed under the GFDL, which requires attribution to the author. Editors who choose not to get an account have their edits attributed to their IP address, which is publically available in the history. Signing comments makes following the conversation easier. If you do not want your IP address to be visible, the only way to achieve this is to get an account. Jkelly 16:42, 6 July 2006 (UTC)