Talk:Why Pink Floyd...?

Should this even be here?

Mentioning of the reissues should be on their respective albums' pages, and not have a Wikipedia page devoted to the reissues alone. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.27.157.13 (talk) 22:33, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Ummagumma?

The article says "collects the band's 14 studio albums." (emphasis added). Ummagumma is included too, isn't it, and it is not a studio album. Bubba73 ^{You talkin' to me?} 23:26, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

Resolved

Bubba73 ^{You talkin' to me?} 05:08, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

Organizing the article? / "DVD Audio" confusion

This article is a mess. There are too many headline levels. I removed several instanses of "DVD Audio" in the text, and applied ""DVD Audio" can be misinterpreted as "DVD-Audio"" as comment.Are1981 (talk) 22:44, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Tracklisting

Surely the way the tracklistings are formatted currently is too confusing? Why aren't they using the standard template? Tohughmitmayconcern (talk) 19:25, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

Where's all the information now?

So you deleted the article. Ahy are the contents not included in respective albums to show what the Experience and Immersion editions contained? There are plenty of albusm where the reissue information contai nthe Deluxe Edition tarcklists and bonus tracks, so why not PF? 85.221.138.4 (talk) 19:01, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

Extensive information about bonus tracks etc is not the sort of information that Wikipedia covers, based on Wikipedia's policies around notability and scope. We actually have a guideline against including it in most situations, so where you see this information, it should probably be removed.

Fortunately, other websites exist. You can get the information you're looking for at Discogs, for example: https://www.discogs.com/label/290516-Why-Pink-Floyd-Experience-Edition Popcornfud (talk) 19:13, 24 November 2023 (UTC)