Talk:White sturgeon

Untitled

This page is getting a bit "Columbia-centic" It needs some more info on Sacramento and Frasier R. populations. I think the discussion of toxics is maybe a bit on the heavy side. --Smartone100 22:10, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Food and drink Tagging

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum caution and careful attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform the project members on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 07:17, 4 July 2008 (UTC) ghgikgikgikjgkjoug

Idaho

White sturgeon also found in the the Snake, lower Salmon and Kootenai rivers of Idaho. Sca (talk) 16:30, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Habitat - fresh water vs anadromous

At the beginning of this section it is intimated that white sturgeon live mostly in fresh water unlike other types of sturgeon. Then later in the section it says the opposite, clearly saying that they are anadromous (which I believe is mostly wrong). It then says white sturgeon become landlocked because of damns. But this is not true in many areas. The Frazer River for example has a threatened but strong population of tens of thousands of these fish, which seem to live there year round and there are no damns on that river. This needs to be cleared up by someone who knows. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Theshowmecanuck (talk • contribs) 19:45, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on White sturgeon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131216082005/http://www.dfw.state.or.us/fish/docs/2014/Statewide_v11-22-13.pdf to http://www.dfw.state.or.us/fish/docs/2014/Statewide_v11-22-13.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060426215418/http://www.bcfisheries.gov.bc.ca/fishinv/fishinfobc.html to http://www.bcfisheries.gov.bc.ca/fishinv/fishinfobc.html
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.uppercolumbiasturgeon.org/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:46, 18 September 2017 (UTC)