Talk:What Was Missing/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Gabriel Yuji (talk · contribs) 20:40, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   No problems.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   Ok.

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   Ok.

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Ok.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

I'll pass it since I couldn't find any major issue that I couldn't correct by myself. Gabriel Yuji (talk) 20:40, 10 November 2013 (UTC)