Talk:What More Can I Give

Latest comment: 9 years ago by 174.126.239.232 in topic F. Marc Schaffel
Good articleWhat More Can I Give has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 27, 2010Good article nomineeListed
February 12, 2010Peer reviewReviewed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on November 18, 2009.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Michael Jackson blamed his record label, Sony Music, for the failed release of his charity song "What More Can I Give", and branded the label's CEO "racist" and "very, very, very devilish"?
Current status: Good article

Source edit

A little info from this source http://mixonline.com/news/audio_michael_jackson_release/index.html --Efe (talk) 12:35, 15 March 2009 (UTC)Reply


genre edit

i would say this is also R&B —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mjlouisdbz14 (talkcontribs) 19:22, 19 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Rerelease edit

It is true that there will be a rerelease of this single in 2009? --Melly42 (talk) 10:23, 4 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Few things... edit

I edited some clauses. First, we can not say that Kosovo is a country because it is not recognized by all states of UN. Second, the reference does not say that Michael Jackson wanted to help only to Albanian Kosavor with 100 percent sure. It can be just a speculation. We can not act so anti-neutral, this is not a big problem but it is important. Most of the refugees were Serbs, Montenegrins and other no-Albanians. There were of course and Albanians but the reference does not say anything. So I think it is appropriate to just put Kosavor and home- not country and Albanian. When we find a 100 percent sure reference, then it will be Ok, untill that... --MajklDzekson (talk) 15:43, 1 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

F. Marc Schaffel edit

One gets the feeling that Schaffel wrote the sections featuring his name prominently. I'm not sure it can be called a neutral point of view.174.126.239.232 (talk) 08:58, 1 August 2014 (UTC)Reply