Talk:What Ever Happened to SpongeBob?/GA1

Latest comment: 10 years ago by Wizardman in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Buffbills7701 (talk · contribs) 14:36, 28 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Well-Written edit

1A edit

  The spelling and grammar is correct.

1B edit

  It complies with the MoS.

Verifiable edit

2A edit

  It contains a list of all the references in the article.

2B edit

  It mentions twice that about 7.7 million viewers watched it, yet had no source to prove it.

I've just move the ref close to the sentence. The source was there but I guess you didn't noticed it.

2C edit

  Read 2B.

  Done

Broad edit

3A edit

  This article addresses the main aspects of the topic.

3B edit

  This article stays on topic, and doesn't go into trivial detail.

Neutral edit

  This article shows both sides of the reception.

Stable edit

  There have been no recent edit wars.

Illustrated edit

6A edit

  The article's pictures have a copyright or a fair-use on them.

6B edit

  All of the pictures relate to the subject and have reasonable captions.

Notes: edit

  • "The series follows the adventures of the title character in the underwater city of Bikini Bottom." For people who don't know the subject, I think that you should remove title character with SpongeBob or something along those lines.
    •   Fixed I've just added "SpongeBob SquarePants".
  • "Upon release, the episode attracted an average of 7.7 million audiences..." I honestly don't like the wording of 7.7 million audiences. Could you make it sound like 7.7 million viewers?
  • Where are your sources for the amount of viewers?
    •   Done The sources are actually there but it so happen that I didn't put it close to the sentence.

Final Result edit

  I'm putting it on hold, although you are really close. All you need is one source that tells me how many people watch it, and then I'll accept it. Good Luck! buffbills7701 15:08, 28 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

I hope the article is all OK now to meet your and the GA criteria. Thank you very much for taking time to review this article. Thanks and have a nice day! :) Mediran (tc) 02:23, 29 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Since I'm mentoring the user on the GA process, I'll give this a second review sometime in the next couple days to make sure everything was caught. Wizardman 04:46, 1 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thanks Wizardman! I hope everything's fine on this ongoing GA review. Thanks and have a nice day! :) Mediran (tc) 09:34, 1 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

I read over the article a couple more times and made some tweaks, but I didn't see any major issues so I'll pass the article. Wizardman 16:24, 3 July 2013 (UTC)Reply