This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shopping Centers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of enclosed shopping malls, outdoor shopping centers, and dead malls on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Shopping CentersWikipedia:WikiProject Shopping CentersTemplate:WikiProject Shopping CentersShopping center articles
Latest comment: 6 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion
This article starts to confuse the planned 2004-- development, which was abandoned due to funding problems in 2008, with the development taking place 2015-2017. The latter has completely (or largely) different plans from the former. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 163.1.88.152 (talk) 17:26, 16 August 2017 (UTC)Reply
I agree. Also, the article as a whole is not particularly clear or otherwise well written. I will attempt to improve it; please see if you feel that in your opinion the revised text better reflects the aborted 2004- redevelopment plan. DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:26, 2 September 2017 (UTC)Reply
Can we get a picture of the new development, to replace the outdated (and rather horrid) one in the infobox? DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:30, 25 October 2017 (UTC)Reply
Visited the centre yesterday and grabbed a snapshot which I'm adding to the article to replace the old main image. It's not the best picture I've ever seen (or even taken!) but at least it is of the new centre and not the old. Anyone have a better pic, feel free to replace mine. DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:45, 4 December 2017 (UTC)Reply
