Greetings! I know you've waited a few months for a review, but I have good news! I'm stuck in a tin can for 5 hours tomorrow late night UTC, so I'm going to use that time wisely to review this article. I expect to have the review posted in the early morning hours UTC the following day. (Approximately less than 36 hours from this post.) I look forward to reading and reviewing this article. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 18:15, 8 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
Most of the content is in good shape, but there are some glaring things that need some attention:
You refer to COMP twice in the lead, but never actually show that it is the same as the College of Osteopathic Medicine of the Pacific until the "History" section. This is confusing.
In the history section, you talk about the first year of classes for the college of pharmacy. Is this the proper name of the pharmacy college? If so, it should be capitalized. If not, why wouldn't use the proper name instead like we do for the other 8 colleges when mentioned.
In the Academics and accreditation section, you state "Each of the programs is graduate,..." a better word than graduate would be post-baccalaureate.
In the second sentence of the section on Interprofessional education, you say 2007 twice. The second time, I would say "later that year."
In the Campus section, about halfway through, it says completion is expected for July 2014. Its now July 2014, do we have updates? If it is within 3 weeks of completion (rest of July), there is usually a ribbon cutting scheduled. If the date has been moved, we should update the article accordingly.
You don't need to use italics to differentiate "Health Science Center" from "Health Professions center Center."
That is my review from the first read-through. I would like to read it again after updates/changes are made. I'd also like to offer a chance for @Wizardman: to offer any advice as they responded to the first review this past March. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 21:55, 10 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
I have made the suggested changes. There was a ribbon cutting ceremony, just a couple weeks ago, so I added that to the article. Thank you for the feedback! Rytyho usa (talk) 00:35, 11 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
You might want to look at that paragraph again. It says it was completed in June 2014, but the end says it will be completed in 2014? TLSuda (talk) 02:14, 11 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
Thanks! I corrected that sentence as well. Rytyho usa (talk) 16:31, 12 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
I'm happy with everything, but I want to give Wizardman a couple more days to contribute. If he doesn't in two days, we will move forward. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 14:45, 13 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
I gave the article a skim (no time to do a full read through alas) and it does look like it's in far better shape than when I reviewed it the first time through. Wizardman 02:39, 15 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
Barring no other issues that have arisen, I am happy to promote this article to GA status! Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 18:32, 16 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
That is excellent! Thank you for your feedback; it was much appreciated. Rytyho usa (talk) 02:45, 17 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
