Talk:Western Kentucky Hilltoppers football

WKU/Western Kentucky naming edit

A discussion I've restarted at the main athletic program page, if anyone's interested. Kithira (talk) 22:09, 4 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Western Kentucky Hilltoppers football. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:14, 22 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Western Kentucky Hilltoppers football. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:37, 23 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Project-wide naming conventions re History section edit

@MHS1976:

There is ongoing WP:DE of this article, including removal of an established, project-wide naming convention. Specifically, Wikipedia:WikiProject College football has created a general format for ~300 CFB team articles (Alabama Crimson Tide football, Akron Zips football, etc), inclusive of a "History" section with multiple "Coach Name era (19YY–19YY)" type subsections. As repeatedly noted, this naming convention can be observed on team articles such as linked at List of NCAA Division I FBS football programs.

In this specific article, the comprehensive use of "XYZ era" subsections is stable to 2014[1] and even earlier when the History section was smaller/contained fewer subsections. Changes to this established structure have been flagged with both DE and MOS:HEAD issues.

As such, I have both initiated this Talk (as your issues have project-wide relevance beyond this specific article) and reverted to the stable convention, pending further discussion of your concerns, here. To the extent there is a grammar issue(?), that would have project-wide implications rather than merely local to this specific article. What do you think? UW Dawgs (talk) 20:25, 25 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

No excuse for using poor English. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by MHS1976 (talkcontribs) 18:30, 5 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

@MHS1976: I've again reverted your edit to the 2014-onward stable version. Just as another editor has reverted you, previously. You are now again engaged in WP:DE and editing against both a local and project-wide format, as explained in this Talk section. A vague response of "poor English" isn't sufficient to overturn this consensus treatment -as nearly every CFB team article has this format, making your viewpoint an apparent outlier. Please do clearly explain and discuss your view, as there are project-wide implications. If you continue to impose your preferred version against this consensus without discussion, this will be escalated. UW Dawgs (talk) 19:46, 5 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

@MHS1976: Per WP:BRD, your DE edit[2] has been reverted to the project-wide format, stable in this article since 2014. Please engage in discussion here, as your preferred format is non-standard. 20:29, 6 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

@MHS1976: What say you? The content formatting was stable to 2014 and conformed with global CFB project naming conventions as used in our FBS and FCB team articles. UW Dawgs (talk) 02:11, 9 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Inappropriate use of the word era edit

@UW Dawgs:

Please stop using "era" to refer to coaching tenures of short duration, it is poor English. Era should be used to refer to long periods. I have been willing to compromise by not removing the word for tenures of 10 years or more, though I think it is a stretch to refer to Denes tenure as an "era". A more appropriate use of the word would be to refer to the Feix era at WKU as extending from his playing days through his post coaching career as Athletic Director (from the 1950's into the 1990's).