Request for Comment: Flag and Coat of Arms edit
{{rfc|hist|soc}} Should the flag and coat of arms of the canton be included in the infobox? Should a paragraph about the controversy about the flag and coat of arms be included in the body of the article? ~~~~
Provide a short answer followed by a brief statement in each of the Survey sections. Do not engage in back-and-forth discussion in the Survey. That is what the Discussion section is for.
Infobox edit
Should the flag and coat of arms of the canton be included in the infobox?
Answer Yes or No or the equivalent, followed by a brief statement.
Survey (Infobox) edit
Body of Article edit
Should one of the following be included in the § Flag and coat of arms section of the article?
- A. - The flag and coat of arms of the West Herzegovina Canton are the former symbols of the Croatian Republic of Herzeg-Bosnia and were originally regulated by the cantonal constitution. However, by a decision of the Constitutional Court, the constitutional provisions on cantonal symbols were marked as unconstitutional in 1998. Acting on the court's decision, the Cantonal Assembly removed the disputed provisions in 2000 and adopted a new law on the flag and coat of arms in 2003.
- B - The flag and coat of arms of the West Herzegovina Canton are the former symbols of the Croatian Republic of Herzeg-Bosnia and were originally adopted through the cantonal constitution, and its usage regulated by cantonal law. However, by 1998 decision of the Constitutional Court these cantonal symbols were ruled unconstitutional. Local authorities still haven't implemented this Constitutional court ruling.
Answer A or B or the equivalent in the Survey, with a brief statement.