This article could be good if someone in the know would take the time to provide references edit

There are far too many sections where someone has just written things without documenting or referencing anything at all. As such, it's not a good article. It could be, but someone would need to invest time in making it better. Wuapinmon (talk) 00:34, 25 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment edit

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 28 March 2019 and 8 May 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Czhu1995.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 12:50, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Comment edit

EF English First, Wenzhou - this is advertising, isn't it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.211.0.163 (talk) 18:23, 16 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Yes. — LlywelynII 09:15, 4 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Coordinates edit

{{geodata-check}} The coordinates need the following fixes:

  • Write here

64.131.234.9 (talk) 22:17, 22 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Religion edit

Between late 2000 and early 2002 the government began destroying or closing churches and temples. This affected Christians, Buddhists and Taoists. A number of large house churches closed up, met in smaller groups and then when things calmed down they met again. No additional reference available as this was a first hand account spoken to this author.

That would be original research then, which has no place in Wikipedia. If you are unable to verify the statement, it should be removed completely. I have removed the last sentence to this page until verification can be obtained. Skinsmoke (talk) 12:27, 30 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

I say go ahead in removing an unsourced, [potentially] controversial claim. --HXL's Roundtable, and Record 21:40, 30 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
Pretty sure I saw something covering this recently, maybe in Niall Ferguson's Civilization, covering the prominence and treatment of Christianity in Wenzhou. — LlywelynII 09:15, 4 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

WSJ resource edit

97.87.29.188 (talk) 01:47, 16 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Chinese housing bubble. 99.181.134.134 (talk) 05:11, 29 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

The sincerest form of flattery edit

For this page, from Wenzhou's office English-language website. (Unless of course we plagiarized them...)  — LlywelynII 09:15, 4 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Formatting edit

To the overzealous and underinformed editor currently reverting my helpful edits, only some of which he is remembering to fix during his blanket undos: Kindly cf. MOS:ZH. The {{zh}} template is not recommended, let alone mandatory, for any Chinese page and its continuing treatment of pinyin as a separate language is a travesty. Your preference of it is noted, but kindly cease the WP:POINTY revisions until such time as a consensus has been established. (Yes, {{zh}} is common; it's still non-mandatory and currently broken.)  — LlywelynII 17:08, 4 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Re: kicking the ball: It's a talk page for a template. It doesn't get enough traffic to build support for changes; I could alter its code myself, but it's that particular editor's personal baby and not a mandatory default so no need to fight over it. If you agree with my formatting, keep it. If you really care, go to the talk page there and voice your support.
That's 3R, so I myself'll stop; but it's still a lousy and non-mandatory template you have no need to force down anyone's throat, least of all when you agree it's broken. — LlywelynII 17:14, 4 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - RPM SP 2022 - MASY1-GC 1260 201 Thu edit

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 27 February 2022 and 5 May 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Yahahaya (article contribs).