This article was nominated for deletion on 26 May 2017. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
A member of the Guild of Copy Editors, Miniapolis, reviewed a version of this article for copy editing on 22 March 2023. However, a major copy edit was inappropriate at that time because of the issues specified below, or the other tags now found on this article. Once these issues have been addressed, and any related tags have been cleared, please tag the article once again for {{copyedit}}. The Guild welcomes all editors with a good grasp of English. Visit our project page if you are interested in joining! Please address the following issues as well as any other cleanup tags before re-tagging this article with copyedit: Notability concerns |
I don't believe that the notability of a company is in play here, but rather that this is a notable long term scam that several government bodies have deemed notable enough to issue warnings about. It's also an older scam, so I doubt there will be much future coverage and the online accessibility of material may decrease. Legacypac (talk) 16:34, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
- According to reliable sources cited in the article, there is no company or formalized organization (although there are fee-paying "members"). It is described as being run online by one person with a cell phone. I'm not sure if it is even intentionally a scam. He seems to have some affinity with the sovereign citizen movement, freemen on the land and that sort of thing, but the similarities are limited. The notability is on the same basis as those ideas, the redemption movement and so on, so the appropriate guideline is WP:FRINGE. Jack N. Stock (talk) 05:11, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
- I paid five hundred dollars and didn’t receive anything. 2600:1700:465B:6410:68E5:4B67:155:4AA1 (talk) 03:20, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Legal cases
editI found two court cases that involved people trying to pay off debts with WeRe Bank "checks": in Scotland and in Canada. Jack N. Stock (talk) 05:33, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
- Nice work on improving this article User:Jacknstock. The Alberta case is just two years old. Legacypac (talk) 06:53, 20 June 2017 (UTC)