Talk:Water polo at the 2012 Summer Olympics – Women's tournament
Latest comment: 11 years ago by Andrwsc in topic Medal infobox
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Water polo at the 2012 Summer Olympics – Women's tournament article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | It is requested that an image or photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Medal infobox edit
As in all events at the olympics that have thus far been competed an infobox for quick reference of medalists is provided (the purpose of an infobox). It is not redundant because the redundant data has been removed, it only provides access for the medalists. The event is also primarily an olympic event not a "water polo tournament" of its own. So the proposal is to use 2 infoboxes wihout redundant data.Lihaas (talk) 20:59, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
- I'll reply with the same comment I placed elsewhere:
- Agree, it's clearly redundant. The only tangible difference is that the Olympic infobox has coloured icons for the medalists, while the other infobox uses the more generic "Champions"/"Runners-up"/"Third place" titles and also includes fourth place. The current infobox also has statistics like average goals per match, which seem trivial to highlight in an infobox in my opinion. But in any case, pick one of these, but using both is silly. — Andrwsc (talk · contribs) 22:28, 9 August 2012 (UTC)