Talk:Water by the Spoonful/GA1

GA Review edit

Latest comment: 2 months ago3 comments1 person in discussion

Unsuccessful. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:35, 22 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: TonyTheTiger (talk · contribs)

Reviewer: Premeditated Chaos (talk · contribs) 23:35, 22 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Yet another QF of one of the mass-nominated articles. A large part of the "Concept" section is uncited. Production section and critical reception sections are both bullet point lists. Why is publication jammed in under critical reception? Why is Hudes' 2008 Tony mentioned here? Inexplicable. The nominator has enough experience to know that this is completely unacceptable, yet nominated the article anyway, desperate for WikiCup points. Absolutely not. I would not fail a less experienced nominator on those grounds, but I have zero interest in giving someone who should know better a free pass just for fake internet points. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:35, 22 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Add topic