Talk:Water Splash, Inc. v. Menon
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled edit
Would be good to add the background of this case, what the circumstances of the parties are. The information might be available here. Would that website be appropriate to cite?
--CapitalCapybara (talk) 01:58, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
- Yes, that would be a good source of information. Another is the "Letters Blogatory" website. I was planning to expand this article once the Court issues its decision, but you're right that the background and lower-court sections can be written now. Regards, Newyorkbrad (talk) 21:18, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- I was going to give writing this article a try for a college course. It would probably make sense to wait and write it all at once but I think it will be OK to do it now :). --CapitalCapybara (talk) 22:01, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment edit
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): CapitalCapybara. Peer reviewers: Camillewyman, Sonofjoat.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 04:48, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Suggestion edit
Hey, here is a really helpful suggestion! Instead of saying "the case was orally argued" you should say "the case was argued orally"! --Janinemalahoff (talk) 22:24, 8 April 2017 (UTC)