Talk:Washington State Route 433

Washington State Route 433 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
November 23, 2010	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on November 30, 2010.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that despite being less than 1 mile (1.6 km) long, Washington State Route 433 is considered a Highway of Statewide Significance by the Washington State Department of Transportation?

United States: Washington Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington.

U.S. Roads: State highways / Washington Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Topics

U.S. state highways

Locations

Washington

This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists.

This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

Article recognition:

	A fact from this article was featured on the Did you know? section of the U.S. Roads Portal in September 2014.

GA Review edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago12 comments2 people in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Washington State Route 433/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: –CG^Talk 23:38, 23 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Some concerns:

Can you merge the AADT and NHS paragraphs together?
- Done --Admrboltz (talk) 23:50, 23 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
  - Looks good! –CG^Talk 00:38, 24 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
The paragraph in the history about the Seattle–Portland Bicycle Classic could be moved to RD, since its not a historical event.
- Done --Admrboltz (talk) 23:50, 23 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
  - Looks good! –CG^Talk 00:38, 24 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
Could you expand the history to include the bridge's history?
- The article is about the highway, not the bridge. If the reader wants to know more about the bridge, they can click on the link. --Admrboltz (talk) 23:50, 23 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
Moving the shields to history would be more relevant.
- - You're right, but the bridge article is lacking in information. ;) –CG^Talk 00:38, 24 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
- While I agree, it would smush the text of the History section between the images & the infobox, which is not recommended in the MOS. --Admrboltz (talk) 23:50, 23 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
  - Now I see it, good point. –CG^Talk 00:38, 24 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
Can you include an image of the bridge or highway from the bridge deck?
- Done --Admrboltz (talk) 23:50, 23 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
  - Looks good! –CG^Talk 00:38, 24 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, –CG^Talk 23:38, 23 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Add topic