Talk:Washington State Route 22/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Excellent description of the route.

It has an excellent description of the route. Reviewer: Allforjesus2 (talk) 19:27, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

I do not disagree with the outcome of this review, but in the sake of completeness, I will do a full review of the article to confirm this. Imzadi 1979 → 22:20, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   There are some minor copy edits needed to clear up the prose. I've made them myself rather than list them here.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   As stated above, I agree with the outcome of the review, if not necessarily the process to arrive at that outcome. As such, I'm affirming the passage of the article. Imzadi 1979 → 22:51, 21 November 2010 (UTC)