Talk:Washington State Route 173/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: TCN7JM (talk · contribs) 01:14, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

I'll review this. I'll try to get to it tonight because I won't be on much tomorrow or Saturday. –TCN7JM 01:14, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

Lead

• "(SR 173)" SR 173 should be bolded, but not the parentheses.
• "a 11.86-mile-long" a → an since the first syllable of "eleven" is a vowel sound.

Route description

• "The 2-lane street" Write out the number two.
• NHS info?
  • Not part of NHS, so it doesn't need to be there.

History

• "The Brewster Bridge was completed in June 1928 as the roadway was first codified in 1931" I don't think as is the right word here. Maybe change it to and or with the route being codified in...
• Not once do you give the exact year for the rebuilding of the Brewster Bridge. Is it not available?
  • Not available. 1976 is earliest ref referring to a rebuilt bridge.

References

• On second thought, you should probably shorten Refs 17 and 19 with hidden text

All other sections are fine.

Final verdict

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall: Just a few minor errors, and I can pass it. –TCN7JM 01:47, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

   Pass/Fail:

• Taken all suggestions and implemented them. SounderBruce 02:20, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

• It would still be nice if you added in there that it isn't part of the NHS, but since that's mainly optional, I won't hold up the review for that small of an issue.

Congrats! –TCN7JM 02:24, 1 February 2013 (UTC)