Talk:Wash Us in the Blood/GA1

Latest comment: 3 years ago by The Ultimate Boss in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: The Ultimate Boss (talk · contribs) 06:08, 1 October 2020 (UTC)Reply


I will review this soon.The Ultimate Boss (talk) 06:08, 1 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

The Ultimate Boss Any updates on this? --K. Peake 20:30, 12 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
  1. Well written:
    1. the prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct;  
    2. it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.  
  2. Verifiable with no original research:
    1. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;  
  • wikilink for Triple J on ref 16
  • remove wikilink for Triple J on ref 18
  •   Done for the above --K. Peake 06:11, 15 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
    1. all in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines;  
    2. it contains no original research; and  
    3. it contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism.  
  1. Broad in its coverage:
    1. it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and 
    2. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). 
  • How is "Based on the platform's community guidelines, the video was age-restricted" important to the article?
  • It was reported on West's official Vevo channel, doesn't this qualify notability? --K. Peake 06:11, 15 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
  1. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. 
  2. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. 
  3. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
    1. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content; and 
    2. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. 
  4. Overall

 

The Ultimate Boss replied, are you ready to pass this now? --K. Peake 06:11, 15 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
Kyle Peake yes it is! The Ultimate Boss (talk) 07:10, 15 October 2020 (UTC)Reply