This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Waroch II is within the scope of WikiProject Celts, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the ancient Celts and the modern day Celtic nations.
If you would like to participate, you can edit this article or you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks or take part in the discussion. Please Join, Create, and Assess.CeltsWikipedia:WikiProject CeltsTemplate:WikiProject CeltsCelts articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Latest comment: 16 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion
I am not entirely convinced that Howorths article is a reliable source. He admits at page 27 of his article (page 319 of the journal) The conclusions I have arrived at are at issue with those of the school of history now dominant, [...]. While I agree with some of his conclusions (especially the back-formation of personal names), it seems his article has not influenced the dominant school of history a lot in almost 130 years.
JSTOR does have limited access. If you have any affiliation with a univeristy or college, you probably have access. If not, you probably need to subscribe. Srnec 04:43, 25 July 2007 (UTC)Reply
I have access and the reference to the source is clear enough. Even if a subscription is required, an online source is more convenient than having to wait until the local library receives a copy of the journal. Erik Warmelink 14:09, 25 July 2007 (UTC)Reply
Anyways, Howorth is only cited for facts in this article. I did not use his paper for any evaluative statements. If I have the time, I will get another source for the statements he currently backs up, but those are hardly, to my knowledge, controversial. Srnec 04:43, 25 July 2007 (UTC)Reply
Please, don't feel obliged to convince me, I am just a —somewhat interested— amateur. If you consider the statements uncontroversial, that's more than enough for me. Erik Warmelink 14:09, 25 July 2007 (UTC)Reply
