Talk:Warner Bros. Movie World/GA1

Latest comment: 3 years ago by CR4ZE in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs) 17:42, 6 October 2020 (UTC)Reply


Hello, I am planning on reviewing this article for GA Status, over the next couple of days. Thank you for nominating the article for GA status. I hope I will learn some new information, and that my feedback is helpful.

If nominators or editors could refrain from updating the particular section that I am updating until it is complete, I would appreciate it to remove a edit conflict. Please address concerns in the section that has been completed above (If I've raised concerns up to references, feel free to comment on things like the lede.)

I generally provide an overview of things I read through the article on a first glance. Then do a thorough sweep of the article after the feedback is addressed. After this, I will present the pass/failure. I may use strikethrough tags when concerns are met. Even if something is obvious why my concern is met, please leave a message as courtesy.

Best of luck! you can also use the {{done}} tag to state when something is addressed. Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs)

Please let me know after the review is done, if you were happy with the review! Obviously this is regarding the article's quality, however, I want to be happy and civil to all, so let me know if I have done a good job, regardless of the article's outcome.

Immediate Failures edit

  • It is a long way from meeting any one of the six good article criteria -
  • It contains copyright infringements -
  • It has, or needs, cleanup banners that are unquestionably still valid. These include{{cleanup}}, {{POV}}, {{unreferenced}} or large numbers of {{citation needed}}, {{clarify}}, or similar tags. (See also {{QF-tags}}). -
  • It is not stable due to edit warring on the page. -

Links edit

Prose edit

Lede edit

  • Add a WP:Short description. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 17:47, 6 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • on the Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia - reword, it's either on the Gold Coast in Queensland, or its in Gold Coast, Queensland. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 17:47, 6 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • ranked third in yearly attendance (behind Sea World and Dreamworld) for Australian theme parks. - is the third highest attended theme park in Australia, behind Sea World and Dreamworld. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 17:47, 6 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • No link for Sea World? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 17:47, 6 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • Dreamworld pipes to a redirect Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 17:47, 6 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • The park contains movie-themed rides, attractions and shows. - isn't that already implied with the theme sentence above? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 17:47, 6 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • Various costumed characters regularly patrol the park to interact and take photos with guests. Each afternoon, characters participate in a parade along the park's Main Street. The park hosts several seasonal events annually, such as the Halloween-themed Fright Nights and Christmas-themed White Christmas. DC Rivals HyperCoaster, opened in 2017, is the most recent among the park's six operating roller coasters. - this doesn't really say anything, perhaps say that there are six coasters (maybe list them and their opening dates)? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 17:47, 6 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

General edit

  • Hollywood interest in Australian film and actors grew rapidly during the 1980s. - is this saying Australian film/actors became interested in Hollywood, or that Hollywood became interested in Australian film/actors? Also needs a citation Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 17:58, 6 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • film producer Dino De Laurentiis - reword to avoid WP:SEAOFBLUE. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 17:58, 6 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • science fiction action film Total Recall. - big SEAOFBLUE. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 17:58, 6 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • left the tanking DEG - "tanking" is probably a bit much here. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 17:58, 6 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • Just to say I won't bring up any more SEAOFBLUEs, but they'll all need fixing, there's quite a few. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 17:58, 6 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • C.V. Wood ⋅- reword to fit title of page Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 17:58, 6 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • lots of ", and..." - need to check and see if the comma is suitable. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 17:58, 6 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • Queensland Premier - you'll need to explain what this is as well as the link. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 17:58, 6 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • Batman Adventure – The Ride - pipes to "Batman Adventure – The Ride 2" which redirects to the first target? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 17:58, 6 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • Lethal Weapon – The Ride - is linked twice with different pipes. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 17:58, 6 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • Far too many "see also". Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 17:58, 6 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • A lot of duplicate links need tidying up. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 17:58, 6 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

@Lee Vilenski: Thank you for taking the time to review this article. I have enacted on your suggestions except where outlined below:

  • It is always "on the Gold Coast" not "in Gold Coast" (ie Ricki-Lee Coulter, Green Lantern Coaster). I can try on the Gold Coast in Queensland" if you prefer, although I think this reads a little awkward.
    • I do prefer "in Queensland", as it is how you read it. Not an expert. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 11:16, 8 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • I've tried to tweak the lead a little per your comments, although I'm unclear how it serves the reader to list all six roller coaster and their opening dates. It s commonplace in amusement park leads to mention the park's last major ride addition (in this case, 2017's DC Rivals).
  • The "Hollywood interest" is already covered by the citation to WP:RS (Local Hollywood book) in the next sentence and I'm wary of CITEKILL.
  • I have tried to recast phrases/remove links per SEAOFBLUE but note that policy says to do this when possible (I'd prioritise succinct prose over fragmented sentences to avoid SEAOFBLUE).
    • Sure. I worry about easteregg links, where it might make it sound like we have an article for a series term, when its actually two links next to each other. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 11:16, 8 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • Replaced "tanking" with "failing"; an adjective is needed here for effect.
  • I fixed "Queensland Premier" so this should be clearer, but I don't see any service to the reader to explain what it is when it is linked.
  • Ran through and checked serial commas: note they are allowed to improve clarity and join two separate clauses. In Australian English we generally avoid them (checked MOS:ENGVAR)—as such, I removed several but kept some where I felt needed.
    • Sure. I have no issue with the oxford comma, so long as it consistent.Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 11:16, 8 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • Fair comment about over-linking and I knew full well I'd get pinged for it. This was lower on my priority list (#1 was sourcing). Having removed (I think) all duplicates, I wonder if it would serve the reader better to have ride names re-linked in the "Park layout" section? Mind they are re-linked in the table (which is appropriate)...
    • I'm happy enough with just one link, tables, captions etc. can have the secondary links. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 11:16, 8 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Really appreciate your helpful commentary. Keep the comments coming. — CR4ZE (TC) 04:44, 7 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

GA Review edit

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):   d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Review meta comments edit

Thanks again, Lee. Really appreciate you taking the time to review. All the best! — CR4ZE (TC) 12:58, 8 October 2020 (UTC)Reply