Talk:Warfare in pre-colonial Philippines

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Military of Pre colonial Philippines. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.geocities.com/TheTropics/Coast/7446/Ragam.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 18:10, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Clothing/Uniform

the middle and right picture, aren't those drawings of non-natives from other territories? the one in the middle most likely from other south east asian territories armed with japanese weaponary where else the picture on the right is from Moluccas — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheaxHendible (talk • contribs) 10:02, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Re-structuring sections

Hi. I've moved sections around a bit so that they make more sense (and to make room for future sections which could provide the context this article badly needs). Just keeping tabs of what I've changed, for everyone's reference. Thus far, I've

• Created a new section to contain "Historical Incidents", so that the background section can be expanded - 8/3/17
• Elevated "Tactics and Strategies" to its own section and elevated it to higher up in the article, for greater emphasis. I'm unsure whether "Strategies" need to be separated from "Tactics", or if one of them needs to be removed due to lack of reliable sources. But that can be determined at a later date. - 8/3/17
• Moved up section header for "Military technology" so that it also covers infantry, cavalry, and artillery. These sections DO seem to describe technologies, rather than mentioning a historical disposition of specialized forces, so I think they're okay under that heading, for now. - 8/3/17
• Changed "Naval forces" to "Naval technologies", still under Military technology. - 8/3/17
• Moved down "Historical Incidents" section to lower in the article so it doesn't disrupt subject flow.

I feel that the article needs new sections to provide geographical and sociopolitical context, and a section to describe sources and the scope of existing academic literature relevant to the topic. I'll get started on that at some point, but if someone wants to get cracking at it, well and good.

That's it for now. Happy editing/revising/expanding/factchecking. - Alternativity (talk) 11:32, 3 August 2017 (UTC)