This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organized Labour, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Organized Labour on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Organized LabourWikipedia:WikiProject Organized LabourTemplate:WikiProject Organized Labourorganized labour articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
While I think this is an important article on Wikipedia, and I personally might support many of the values and aims of the organisation, from a Wikipedia perspective I have doubts that it meets neutrality requirements. For that reason, I think it should be reviewed so that a more balanced and encyclopaedic perspective can be written into the current text. Libby norman (talk) 00:22, 6 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
I've done some tidy ups on heads and copy that is most emotive and does not meet WP:NPOV guidelines. I still believe there are issues on copy and sourcing – most notably the reliance on a primary source. Libby norman (talk) 08:46, 24 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
