Talk:Ward Kimball
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Image copyright problem with Image:FH5.jpg
editThe image Image:FH5.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
- That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --01:45, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
- Hello, Mr. Automated Bot. I have removed the image in question; its rationale did not cover its use in this article. -kotra (talk) 03:08, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
Especially unique
editFirst paragraph of Career uses the phrase "especially unique". Degrees of uniqueness are hard to obtain, and the article might better use a different phrase. Suggestions? Snezzy (talk) 07:11, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
- Well, I'm not one who believes that uniqueness can't have degrees; the sentence seems to be saying that while many animators at Disney had unique styles, Kimball's was especially unique -- that is, even more different from lesser animators' efforts. But I do agree that it can read awkwardly; I think just saying that his efforts "stand out" is sufficient, rather than saying they "stand out as especially unique". Powers T 13:05, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Ward Kimball. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120119210548/http://ocresort.ocregister.com/2011/11/14/another-generation-on-the-disney-rails/99693/ to http://ocresort.ocregister.com/2011/11/14/another-generation-on-the-disney-rails/99693/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120206165336/http://ocresort.ocregister.com/2010/06/01/disneyland-railroad-engineers-fire-up-the-locomotives/46233/ to http://ocresort.ocregister.com/2010/06/01/disneyland-railroad-engineers-fire-up-the-locomotives/46233/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:11, 9 December 2017 (UTC)