This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the War at the Warfield article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | War at the Warfield has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | War at the Warfield is part of the Slayer discography series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
edit- This review is transcluded from Talk:War at the Warfield/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Cannibaloki 22:46, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
Checklist
editGA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B. MoS compliance:
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
On hold for a week.--Cannibaloki 01:48, 12 August 2010 (UTC)- Failed due to reason below (Second opinion). EricLeb01 (Page | Talk) 20:20, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
- Pass or Fail:
Comments
edit- Recorded at Warfield Theatre in San Francisco, California on December 7, 2001, it is the band's first video album. It is not the band's second video? You forgot 1995's Live Intrusion.
- Done (fixed)
- Filmed at the Warfield Theatre in San Francisco, California on December 7, 2001, (exactly 60 years after the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor) War at the Warfield would become Slayer's first music DVD. What "exactly 60 years after the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor" has to do with this video?
- Isn't it a little notable to mention that it was recorded on the 60th anniversary of the Attack on Pearl Harbor?
- If it was intentionally recorded for that date, or if the theme of the album demonstrates a tilt toward the subject (both require a source), then yes. Otherwise, no. EricLeb01 (Page | Talk) 19:26, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
- On July 25, 2003, four days before its release, MTV announced the DVD's contents, stating that it was "recorded at San Francisco's Warfield theater in December 2001," and featured "19 live songs, the unedited video for "Bloodline" from 2001's God Hates Us All and 50 minutes of interview footage." Please turn this quote into plain text. Take a look at Wikipedia:Quotations.
- Done
Doing...--Cannibaloki 22:46, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
Second opinion by Ericleb01
editI'm following up on Cannibaloki's review. I completed an entire copy-edit of the article, but I'm going to have to fail this, mainly because it doesn't cover enough material. The "Bostaph's departure" section does not belong in this article, as, while it does mention the DVD, his leave from the band has nothing to do with it. With that gone, I would recommend you look at other example concert video GAs, such as Number Ones (video) and Celebration: The Video Collection, as well as WP:ALBUM#Article body for some ideas. Also, use a bit less quotations, as it disrupts the flow when reading. This is really close to passing in my book, however, so don't give this up! EricLeb01 (Page | Talk) 20:20, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for taking a look.--Cannibaloki 20:40, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:War at the Warfield/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: --CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 01:14, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
Article
edit- Release date needs source
- You should tell us where Jon Wiederhorn is from.
- You need to source the "Personnel" section with the liner notes.
- Do you have a source for its director?
- It can be verified in Personnel. CrowzRSA 23:45, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
Overall, being the short length of the article, there aren't many issues. Looks pretty good. Address these issues.--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 03:06, 11 November 2010 (UTC)