This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Added pic now and removed template. Sorry have not a good external one, but may have better soon. The copy needs expanding for that (it's an interesting site), but this fills the pic gap for now I hope. Tarquin Binary09:49, 25 February 2007 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 17 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
It's now know as the Wapping Project (this encompasses the restaurant Wapping Food). Unless the focus should be on the Power Station characteristics, suggest rename to Wapping Project, redirect Wapping Hydraulic Power Station. Split if sufficient info on both is available Paulbrock03:42, 30 April 2007 (UTC)Reply
Disagree. I would suggest exactly the opposite. The restaurant is highly unlikely to ever warrant separate inclusion in WP, and I suspect the same is true of the arts centre, whereas the building is of some historical significance, and the bulk of the article currently relates to that. It is more likely that verifiable (paper) references can be found for the power station than its newer incarnation.
I would suggest creating a redirect for Wapping Project to here, and then splitting that off if it later becomes notable in itself and enough can be written about it.
The arts centre is fairly well-known and does get coverage in Broadsheets, often comparing it to the Tate Modern (i.e. exhibition space in old power station). More google hits for Wapping Project(12,300) than Wapping Hydaulic Power Station(2,240). I think both are notable, and if I get time will try to gather enough material for two articles!