Talk:Wanna One

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Sbusisoduma302 in topic Disbandment of Wanna One

Semi-protected edit request on 20 June 2017 edit

I would like to add a group picture, better description, and reliable sources for verification. Kalika1214 (talk) 22:31, 20 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. You are welcome to upload a group photo, as long as it is one that complies with the Wikipedia:Image use policy. Once you do, you can make another request here so other editors can evaluate it. The same applies to the "better description and reliable sources." We can't tell if that should be added if you don't say what you think the description and sources should be. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 22:48, 20 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed reversion to member listing by age edit

We should change the listing of members by ranking on Produce 101 Season 2 to their ages instead. I understand the listing by ranking however it is more common on other Wikipedia articles of K-pop groups to list members of a group by age, highest to lowest.[1][2][3][4][5] This order by ranking may confuse readers, particularly those who did not watch Produce 101. iphpwj17 (talk) 14:27, 28 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Agreed: I just checked I.O.I and the members section is, as you say, in order of age, so I feel that Wanna One being of the same origins, should follow the same format. Abdotorg (talk) 14:41, 28 June 2017 (UTC)Reply
Agreed: For the same reasons that users iphpwj17 and Abdotorg had presented. Eugh jei Kaorin 15:44, 28 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Once again, I propose the reversion to member listing by age; the editor who re-listed them by rank says that the listing should be as impartial as possible. However, wouldn't listing by age be even more impartial than listing by rank? Members were voted to those ranks by the public (which I think sort of disproves the impartiality listing by ranks). I may be wrong, but that's what I was thinking. Iphpwj17 (talk) 04:54, 29 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Agreed: Should be listed by age, they can be listed by rank in Produce 101 article, but not on group's page Snowflake91 (talk) 10:22, 29 June 2017 (UTC)Reply
Yup, I'm thinking of the same thing. We should have the editor who keeps re-listing them by ranks participate in this discussion. But it's difficult if they're not established Wiki users, considering the possibility of their IP address to change when editing articles. Eugh jei Kaorin 02:19, 30 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

References

  1. ^ "Astro (South Korean band)". Wikipedia. Retrieved 28 June 2017.
  2. ^ "Got7". Wikipedia. Retrieved 28 June 2017.
  3. ^ "Oh My Girl". Wikipedia. Retrieved 28 June 2017.
  4. ^ "Twice (band)". Wikipedia. Retrieved 28 June 2017.
  5. ^ "Red Velvet (band)". Wikipedia. Retrieved 28 June 2017.

Kang Daniel's Page edit

I want you to use this page on Kang Daniel's name.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kang_Daniel

I am currently working on it. Thanks!

Hello everyone, I think Daniel's page must be created and have its own and not redirected to the main page of wanna one since he already have his solo activities and he already received an award on his own. There are already many information that can be used to improve his page that can make it a worthy one. Please consider it. ThanksKpopstan (talk) 07:24, 1 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Number 8 at WP:BAND is talking about the "major music awards" (in Korea, only MAMA and GDA can be considered as "major award" IMO), not TV variety shows awards, see WP:ENTERTAINER for general criteria – "Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions." Being one of the cast members on 2 variety shows is not enough, and the It's Dangerous Outside The Blankets is probably not even notable enough to have an own wiki page. Snowflake91 (talk) 10:39, 1 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Disbandment of Wanna One edit

Is it true? What are the reasons for Wanna One's disbandment? Sbusisoduma302 (talk) 09:50, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply