Talk:Walter Wellman

Latest comment: 13 years ago by Moonriddengirl in topic Copyright problem removed

Sources edit

Here is one literature source for Walter Wellman.

  • William Barr (2005). THE FRANZ JOSEF LAND ARCHIPELAGO: E.B. BALDWIN'S JOURNAL OF THE WELLMAN POLAR EXPEDITION 1898–1899. P.J. Capelotti (Editor). 2004. Jefferson, NC, and London: McFarland and Co. ix+186p, illustrated, soft cover. ISBN 0-7864-1776-5. Polar Record, 41, pp 75-76. doi:10.1017/S003224740428411X

-84user (talk) 15:30, 18 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Removed copyrighted text edit

I had to remove certain sections because they were verbatim copies of a copyrighted book. I replaced some with expand-sect tags because I do not have time to paraphrase them right now. I stopped checking at Airships. -84user (talk) 15:30, 18 July 2008 (UTC)fixed typo-84user (talk) 15:52, 18 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

I know the author of this text personally -- might it not be easiest to simply ask him to license the text under the GFDL? Clevelander96 (talk) 16:48, 18 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Update: (over two years later) I have just noticed there was more copyright violations in Walter Wellman that I missed the last time I checked in 2008. There was extensive copy paste from a 1999 book added here. Here I removed some parts, and rewrote others with inline citations. There remains several sentences that are uncited; they each need citation, they may be copyright violations or plagiarisms. If the original author (Capelotti) were to license the text under the GFDL, I suppose we could accept the text, but the added texts would need attributing in any case. Maybe a few quotes could be used if they summarised an opinion in a nice way? Meanwhile I have listed this article at Wikipedia:Copyright problems#15 October 2010 in case there are problems I have missed. -84user (talk) 23:47, 15 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Searching Google Books confirms that the bulk of content contributed by this user was copied from 2005's Encyclopedia of the Arctic, Volume 3 by Mark Nuttel. Some of this content had already been removed, but whole sentences remained unchanged. Cf. [1], [2], [3], [4]. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:01, 23 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Copyright problem removed edit

One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:01, 23 October 2010 (UTC)Reply