Talk:Wallace Smith Broecker

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (January 2018)

POV removal

edit

On the recent addition by RonCram. Ron, you are adding your own POV to the page... Let me itemize them:

often cited
This paper isn't cited often. There are 79 citations to this one - so few that it comes in at page 3 on a Google scholar search for Broeckers papers. (the topmost has 555 citations). His 2006 conference paper "The Great Conveyer" is cited 296 times.
If MWP was truly global, then the warmer temperatures experienced in the last 30 years may be considered unexceptional.
Whether or not the MWP was global - has no bearing on your statement that it was warmer - which isn't the current scientific opinion.
Regarding predictions of future catastrophic global warming
This one is really bad - "catastrophic" is entirely your own invention. His statement is on mode-changes (or abrupt changes), something that isn't captured in models - from my readings you can equate this with Hansen's "tipping points".

Please try to have an NPOV attitude when writing. --Kim D. Petersen 05:00, 1 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Wallace Smith Broecker. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:44, 26 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Wallace Smith Broecker. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:05, 23 January 2018 (UTC)Reply